Crime and Justice International Magazine - Sam Houston State University

Saturday
Sep 04th
  • Login
  • Sign up
    Registration
    Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
    Name: *
    Username: *
    E-mail: *
    Password: *
    Verify Password: *
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home arrow Terrorism arrow War on Terror
War on Terror
The Human Audit: Interviewing the Islamic Extremist PDF Print E-mail
by Barry L. McManus   

Barry L. McManusIf one's goal is to identify potential terrorists (those seeking to enter the United States to engage in potentially hostile activities), the first opportunity occurs when the potential terrorist attempts to enter the United States. The facts: Twenty-six al-Qaeda terrorist conspirators – eighteen Saudis, two Emiratis, one Egyptian, one Lebanese, one Moroccan, one Pakistani, and two Yemenis – sought to enter the United States for the specific purpose of carrying out a suicide mission. The first member of this team began to acquire the means to enter the United States two years and five months before the 9/11 attack.

Three of the conspirators were “known or knowable” by intelligence authorities as al-Qaeda terrorists in early 2000, but their biographic information was not fully developed or provided to border authorities for the watch list at U.S. consulates abroad (by State Department) and at the border (by Immigration and Customs border inspectors).

Read more...
 
War and Fear: Unfortunate Choices PDF Print E-mail
by Richard Allan   

Image
Two years ago in Brussels I attended what was an impressively large international conference whose broad topics examined the multiple of issues that are created by acts of terrorism. The topics included the effects of terrorism on transportation, agriculture, communications, cross-border cooperation, and on and on. The vast majority of attendees were European and the conference showcased panelists who were either technocrats or fairly high-level governmental officials. Few of them were Americans.

The night before the conference officially opened, I was invited to dinner at the home of a European ambassador. I could not fathom why the invitation was extended to me, until the verbal attacks against the United States by almost all of the non-American guests began and continued beyond dinner and unabated through the three conference days. At the dinner, the former president of a Scandinavian country asked me why America would, “in the name of international legal sanity,” describe its challenge to combat terrorism as a war on terrorism. Frankly, as I will explain, I had no answer, for I agreed with his assessment. During the conference there was a steady barrage of attacks and complaints from the podium that the Americans had made a tremendous mistake in declaring or creating a war on terrorism with its legal consequences which, in turn, they believed hindered the ongoing attempts to harness and prevent terrorism.

Read more...
 
Homeland Security: The Israel Connection PDF Print E-mail
by Gad J. Bensinger   

In the aftermath of September 11, 2001, the long-standing American-Israeli strategic alliance has assumed new practical aspects, especially in the area of homeland security.

Elements of the growing cooperation between the United States and Israel include the following: formal written agreements, law enforcement exchange programs created to enhance cooperation between American and Israeli top-level law enforcement personnel, visits to Israel by federal and local public officials aiming to acquaint themselves with Israel’s homeland security measures developed to protect citizens against suicide bombings and other terrorist attacks, and technical cooperation between the two countries. This article briefly documents some of these developments.

Read more...
 
Ramadan Violence:Urban Areas Hit PDF Print E-mail
by OICJ Staff   

AlgeriaIn one of the world's bloodiest undeclared wars, days of bomb attacks have brought Algeria's Muslim fundamentalist conflict back to the heart of Algiers, the Algerian capital. Two more bombs ripped through the center of Algeria's most important military town, Blida, 30 miles to the south. "The blasts have shattered the perception that the cities are safer, after the massacres in the villages at the start of (the Muslim fasting month) Ramadan," said one European political analyst. "And the violence will certainly continue." A Canadian diplomatic source said the embassy was recommending that Ottawa tell anyone who did not have an urgent reason to visit Algeria to stay away, especially for the next two months.

Ramadan began on the tenth of January. At least 300 people have since died, Algerian newspapers say. "The violence was expected during Ramadan, as in previous years. What makes this year different is thesheer intensity, bloodiness, and certainty it will continue," the analyst said. Massacres in isolated villages marked the start of the month. Then bombs hit Algiers and Blida.

Algeria's radical Armed Islamic Group (GIA) had promised to intensify what it has termed its "holy war" during Ramadan, threatening a 50-bomb campaign. In addition to bombs which have killed and wounded, at least 17 more have been defused in the past three weeks. GIA leader Antar Zouabri, in a statement displayed in Algiers, vowed, "We have the means and the men to punish all those who are not on our side."

Diplomats see the statement as the only explanation for bombs in markets and poor districts normally home to the jobless young, many with fundamentalist leanings. In January, the independent Algerian paper El Watan said of what it termed "murderous madness: "There is no explanation (for this), from citizens or from experts on the motivation or logic of war." It has been five years since the authorities scrapped a general election which Islamists were poised to win. Violence erupted and about 60,000 people have died. Women, children,and foreigners, all have been sucked into the whirlpool of bloodshed.

The government, through Interior Minister Mustapha Ben Mansour, told an already wary population to increase vigilance, admitting "it is difficult to ward off bomb attacks." He was not quoted any longer as mentioning the long-stated government claims that only "residual terrorism" now remains.

Diplomats say the violence has eroded political support for the Islamic fundamentalists which had produced rallies of over 100,000 supporters for the now banned Islamic Salvation Front and massive protests. The likelihood of mass unrest has diminished. "The way things are going right now, they (the authorities) are good for another five years. But so is the opposition. There is evidence they are being supported from outside, by Afghan rebels and others," one diplomat said, without elaborating.

Police in Germany and France searched for Islamic militants suspected of acquiring explosives for the GIA. Algiers also has accused Iran and Sudan of supporting Muslim radicals. Diplomatic sources in Algiers say the latest bloodshed, in what one called "the madness of Algeria," could only produce more violence - a military-security crackdown, and a response from the armed groups.

 

Search

Syndicate

Who's Online

We have 5 guests online