|
Citizen Violence against Korean Police |
|
|
|
|
by Sunghoon Roh and Tae Choo
|
 Violent encounters between police and citizens have been one of the most controversial issues in the realm of criminal justice. Of the various problems regarding the violent contact between the police and the citizen, the use of force by police officers and especially violence by the police drew most attention from scholars. Thus, studies usually place emphasis on how to prevent excessive use of police force and how to minimize harm to citizens caused by police. Furthermore, a great deal of media coverage also emphasizes police brutality and the use of firearms by the police (Margarita, 1980). Despite the abundant studies and policies regarding the use of force by the police, the lack of studies examining the use of force by citizens against police officers, and the injuries that result, is noteworthy. Bayley and Garofalo (1989) found that patrol officers are involved in violent incidents that are associated with physical force from suspects once every eight and one-third working days. Though quite a few police officers are injured or sometimes killed by violent suspects in reality, researchers have paid less attention to this critical issue. The relative dearth of studies in this area is partly due to the general assumption that police officers are doomed to being exposed to situations where the risk to be assaulted or murdered is extremely high (Margarita, 1980).
The Korean Police is not exempt from violence by citizens. Many field officers, such as patrol officers and criminal detectives, are often exposed to violence from citizens, and sometimes the officers are injured. Though the risk of violence at the hands of suspects is regarded as an inevitable element of police work, nevertheless the violent encounters in Korea are still beyond full and complete understanding. Even though the majority of violence against police officers occurs when they attempt to arrest suspects or deter criminal activities, many other violent incidents take place in association with misdemeanor cases or even without any specific reason. While the former violent incidents are more likely to be “reactive” in nature, the latter appear to be more “proactive.” In other words, some suspects resort to violent methods as a reaction to an officer’s intervention, but others initiate violent confrontations on their own without any provocation by the officers. The proactive use of violence is important because it can be seen as an expression of the public’s negative perception of the police in Korea. People who had previous contact with police officers, for example, may have a negative perception that the police are corrupt or unfair. Since such a negative perception of the police can function as a catalyst for the use of violence against police officers, it is often impossible to explain public violence against officers properly, simply by resorting to the circumstantial factors surrounding the assaults. Thus, a proper explanation of such proactive assaults requires sufficient understanding of how citizens perceive the police. |
|
Read more...
|